[albedoa]

Since they're looking for feedback, I'd suggest changing either of the "Simple" or "Innovative" labels, as those words are not necessarily antonyms.

Perhaps "Simple" and "Complex" if that's what they're going for. Or "Traditional" and "Innovative" if they are referring to the novelty of the method.

[codeodor]

Along the same line, the "Good, Bad, or Murky" value judgements are dependent on the POV, so it would be nice to see them explain how / why certain attacks got labelled one way as opposed to the others.

[dmooney1]

Perhaps a third dimension? Certainly there are simple and innovative hacks. Certainly there are complex, traditional hacks.

[hammock]

You mean fourth. The third dimension is good/bad/murky.

[dmooney1]

You are right. I hadn't even noticed those checkboxen.