|
|
|
|
|
by otde
1826 days ago
|
|
Here’s what I mean when I asked us to consider perspectives of trans people —- I want you to understand us not just as potential perpetrators of violence here, but also as recipients. Trans women are subject to prison rape at apparently disproportionate levels [1][2] when housed in men’s prisons. Instead of framing this as “is it ethical to move a woman to a women’s prison on the off chance she’s a man gaming the system,” I would consider asking “is it an acceptable tradeoff to keep a woman in men’s prison on the off chance she’s a secret rapist, even if her chances of being raped herself are increased as a result?” It’s worthwhile to interrogate some of the ways we frame these kinds of discussions, implicitly or otherwise, myself included! [1] https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/transgender-women-ar... [2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prison_rape_in_the_United_St... |
|
Self-ID in particular is a salient issue in the UK because the Conservative government had plans to implement it, but recently scrapped those plans in favour of the existing system (trans people in the UK can get legal recognition of their gender change but it's a medicalised process that takes one year; the proposed changes would have made it as easy as signing a single piece of paper.) I don't know what the perfect system looks like, but we need to be able to talk about edge cases.
By the way, Karen White wasn't suspected of being a "secret rapist" - she was a rapist. The reason she was in jail in the first place was that she had been convicted of raping women.