[gonehome]

That seems like a worthwhile thing to publicize in and of itself?

The replication crisis in psychology threw out 50% or so of supposed scientific results.

If this (or just straight fraud) is common elsewhere, it seems like knowing about that would be a good thing for science.

[msapaydin]

I agree, most top conferences nowadays publish reviews openly, and address this issue I think. Also it is easier said than done, this is so endemic in so many different academic settings, not just in the US, but also in Europe.