I'm assuming it is accurate, it is still misleading. It makes it look like she should be breaking records and crushing the competition, when in truth she is doing neither.
She is crushing the competition by winning 95% of the time and got placed 4th at the age of 43, stealing the place & glory of another top-tier athlete at their peak performance.
How is that not an extraordinary feat had she been a biological female? So no, there's nothing misleading about that chart, you just read it wrong.