Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by narrator 1820 days ago
The most annoying common form of propaganda is the association fallacy, which is a more subtle form of the ad hominem fallacy [1].

It works like this:

A. You believe X.

B. A crazy person also believes/believed X.

C. You are a crazy person.

D. Optionally: I won't consider your argument unless you tell me why being a crazy person is ok. Why do you support doing crazy people things like being a serial killer?

Example:

A. You are against cigarette smoking.

B. The Nazis were also against cigarette smoking[2].

C. Therefore you are a Nazi.

D. Optionally: I won't consider your argument unless you tell me why being a Nazi is ok. Why do you support anti-semitism?

This is by far the most common bullshit argument I get when talking with people about controversial topics.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy#Guilt_by_a...

[2]https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/251213.The_Nazi_War_on_C...

2 comments

Just a little side note to this. You can tell a big propaganda push is coming when the news reports.

Police are saying that person who is obviously crazy and did <bad thing> also happened to believe in X.

Coming up. A special report where we look at all the crazy people who believe X.

Did <historical bad guy> believe in X? Find out next as we explore history.

Should the statue of historical person be removed because he believed X?

And so on and so forth.

That's extremely common, and used viciously in pop culture typically to demonize someone not sufficiently radical enough on an issue.

But it's not really propaganda.