So what you are saying is that Disney can do it better than your small country can. Thereby we need to suppress “better” and allow for “worse” to surface.
Let me ask you this then. Who actually wins in this scenario?
For my own country market Disney can do it cheaper, free .
If I want to make a cartoon to promote say a traditional story I need to do a lot of work and then sell my work.
Disney already made a local TV channel where they just translate their existing american stuff, slap ads and profit.
So what are the upsides and downsides
- Disney makes money
- US pushes their culture(including the wird shit where is super funny to have characters tortured by explosions, dropping big objects on them or those children/teen movies where is fun to bully the dorks)
- only win is our children have more options then we had in the past
I do not want to suppress Disney, I would put a tax , use that to sponsor some local animation schools to create more content with local themes.
There are a few local cartoons, there are small budget and the reason they exist is because parents demand/appreciate such products.
I did not watched cable TV in years but last time I did there were only american translated channels for children but with youtube I could watch with my son cartoons from different countries but this cartoons don't have a giant behind them to create their own TV channels.
Now let me respond to you in a similar way you did, maybe you understand it better.
You create a cool app but when you try to sell it MS, Google and Apple release a similar app for free, you try then to make a different app but again the giant has a free offer, you do that again and again but all the time a similar but not identical free product was launched by the giants for free. Your products were better but the giants had a free shittier version so you only gained a small market. You might say that is OK you get screwed because customers got free stuff, but is it free though? The giants made the money in different way(sometimes in ilegal ways, sometimes in a l4gal but unethical way).
My point is there is no actual fair competition when you compete with a giant, so if Windows or Notepad is the most installed OS/program you would be wrong to conclude that means this is because of the quality of the product.
For my own country market Disney can do it cheaper, free . If I want to make a cartoon to promote say a traditional story I need to do a lot of work and then sell my work. Disney already made a local TV channel where they just translate their existing american stuff, slap ads and profit.
So what are the upsides and downsides
- Disney makes money
- US pushes their culture(including the wird shit where is super funny to have characters tortured by explosions, dropping big objects on them or those children/teen movies where is fun to bully the dorks)
- only win is our children have more options then we had in the past
I do not want to suppress Disney, I would put a tax , use that to sponsor some local animation schools to create more content with local themes.
There are a few local cartoons, there are small budget and the reason they exist is because parents demand/appreciate such products.
I did not watched cable TV in years but last time I did there were only american translated channels for children but with youtube I could watch with my son cartoons from different countries but this cartoons don't have a giant behind them to create their own TV channels.
Now let me respond to you in a similar way you did, maybe you understand it better.
You create a cool app but when you try to sell it MS, Google and Apple release a similar app for free, you try then to make a different app but again the giant has a free offer, you do that again and again but all the time a similar but not identical free product was launched by the giants for free. Your products were better but the giants had a free shittier version so you only gained a small market. You might say that is OK you get screwed because customers got free stuff, but is it free though? The giants made the money in different way(sometimes in ilegal ways, sometimes in a l4gal but unethical way).
My point is there is no actual fair competition when you compete with a giant, so if Windows or Notepad is the most installed OS/program you would be wrong to conclude that means this is because of the quality of the product.