|
|
|
|
|
by trishankdatadog
1819 days ago
|
|
> >The complexity designed into this system might make sense. TUF is very complex and not worth it for most projects, but Debian is exactly what TUF is designed for. I disagree that TUF is too complicated for most projects. While our documentation, tutorials, and tooling can be better, the setup is about just as complicated as, say, devising an in-toto root layout. Most open source projects should really just worry about subscribing to something like PEP 480 and signing with one-time Fulcio keys. But I think we are largely on the same page here: yes, please just minisign/signify if you want simplicity, but if you want resilience from nation-state attacks, you need something like TUF (coupled with in-toto and sigstore). We are happy to advise. |
|
I've heard great things about TUF but if you want people to adopt it then it seems like the documentation/tutorials/tooling should be a first class citizen