|
|
|
|
|
|
by diveanon
1829 days ago
|
|
|
My understanding of this was that they lost the ability to manufacture semi-conductors during the collapse and that the mining and refining process of rare earths was too energy intensive to be profitable in a resource starved economy. |
|
|
It would be rather rude to burn it in a post sealevel-rise world, but it is still there. Even after peak oil there would be electricity and heavy industry. It wouldn't be hard to lose advanced semiconductor manufacturing, (A war in Taiwan would do it) but halting production of advanced chips just rewinds us to 1980, not 1600.
PV production is ultra high volume and geographically dispersed. I don't see any way to take it all out without hundreds of EMP bombs or some kind of ultra-solar flare that fries all electronics worldwide.
In which case you wouldn't have genetic engineering. Or cities. What's left of humanity would be in small villages, engaging in subsidence agriculture.
You could set a novel in such a future, but it would be rather monotonous and unpleasant.