[arpstick]

MA resident as well, what worries me more is that someone thought that this method of installation was a good idea and even more worrying is that they were also able to execute on it. It feels rather shady and nefarious the lack of public announcement on it. Shenanigans like this how you get the populace to trust the local government less, which is the last thing this country needs.

[dvfjsdhgfv]

It's actually great it's happened. It showed everybody that the government can install whatever they want on your phone without your consent and knowledge. In this case they decided to leave you the option to uninstall but in the future they might not and spy on you at will. Another reminder you are not the owner of your device.

[tunap]

-In this case they decided to leave you the option to uninstall but in the future they might not and spy on you at will.

Then they'll be just like Google, Fecebook, Amazon, etc, etc.

[dvfjsdhgfv]

Which leads to the question: if anyone powerful or wealthy enough can take total control of your phone, how comfortable do you feel with that?

There are two routes here. One way is to deal with it the European way, i.e. to try to fix it by a legal framework. The other one is a technical solution like Purism, which is very far from mainstream still. The sooner people realize they have a problem, the sooner they start organizing to find a solution.

[underseacables]

My kids really want an oculus but I absolutely refuse to let Facebook into our house, anymore than I knowingly have to; I’m sure they’ve weaseled in other ways I don’t know about yet.

[serial_dev]

I don't see anything bad with people not trusting their local government... Exhibit A

[sp332]

Maybe they shouldn't blindly trust it, but they should be able to hold it accountable.

[marvindanig]

Well, given that a significant percentage of citizenry is anti-vaxxer-level-stupid, there isn't much improvement over people trusting their local Government either…

[tunap]

Considering in a not too distant yesterday(pre-Covid) the "anti-vaxxers" were all liberal/granola types and now they are magically all conservative/racist types, perhaps you may want to re-assess your 2-dimensional view of the real world. I believe a cogent example was on the front-page of HN just a day or two ago, but IANYG.

[slumdev]

"Not too distant" means only five years ago. The "anti-vaxxers" were people who lived in primarily white, primarily wealthy, primarily urban or suburban environments and who refused (usually) the MMR vaccine.

You don't find measles outbreaks in rural Mississippi. You find them in Washington, New York, and California. [1]

So it's pretty rich to label someone as an "anti-vaxxer" for refusing the experimental, emergency-use, mRNA jabs, when that person has never demonstrated even the slightest hesitancy about receiving or administering every other approved vaccine.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measles_resurgence_in_the_Unit...

[underseacables]

Labels like anti-vaxxer just seems to be weaponized propaganda to me. It’s a cheap, easy way to discredit someone you don’t agree with. Hopefully as time goes on and disparaging groups throw these accusations back-and-forth of each other, that it eventually dilutes their meaning and impact.

[marvindanig]

lol. I never mentioned the political leanings of the anti-vaxxer type; just that they are either very stupid people or misinformed by propaganda originating somewhere. it's interesting to see multiple downvotes on my comments from the folks who probably saw what's not written up there, just like you did. the "conservative/racist type" you said?

quick question: what made you put the labels conservative and racist together?

also, a liberal eating granola bar might be stupid, but their actions do not put anyone else in danger. an anti-vaxxer however is a risk to the society in that they are an active and potential host to a disease in circulation.