Meta-metascience has been studied _extensively_ by previous generations, where what this generation calls "science" was called "natural philosophy" and interesting discourse and study was had on such things as:
It turns out that these are hard areas of study and it requires a lot of properly focused leisure time to understand properly. Most people don't consider these things, wing it, and wind up working with a half-baked meta-meta science of their own creation ... oh, I see what you mean :-D
* The study of knowledge (epistemology): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology
* The study of existence and what exists (ontology): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology
* The study of the purpose of things (teleology): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleology
It turns out that these are hard areas of study and it requires a lot of properly focused leisure time to understand properly. Most people don't consider these things, wing it, and wind up working with a half-baked meta-meta science of their own creation ... oh, I see what you mean :-D