|
|
|
|
|
|
by hypersoar
1834 days ago
|
|
|
An issue that comes to mind is, ironically, authority. Who decides when a paper has been discredited? I can see all sorts of incentive problems with such a system. On the other hand, Westlaw is only cataloging what has already been decided. If the Supreme Court overturns a prior case, then it's overturned whether you agree with the reasoning or not. |
|
|