[boredprograming]

Where does it say that? I've never seen it. And if it's required, does it have to be on this list? I don't see why it matters if vaccine is on some random list or not. How is it a lie if they have to report adverse effects and it's not on the list? There's plenty of things they have to report that aren't on any lists

[spadez]

>"The Reportable Events Table (RET) reflects what is reportable by law"

>Where does it say that? I've never seen it.

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availabi...

>In the current pandemic, these reports are being used to monitor the occurrence of both known adverse events, as providers of COVID-19 vaccines are required to report serious adverse events to VAERS.

By the way, this also blows your main argument out of the water.

[boredprograming]

And I found it on the VAERS FAQ https://vaers.hhs.gov/faq.html

> Healthcare providers are required to report to VAERS the following adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination [under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)],

It's not on the pdf because it's either outdated or because COVID vaccines are on emergency authorization. There's not a giant conspiracy because something isn't on a random pdf, like I was saying

[spadez]

Ok, so your opinion is that the PDF might be outdated. Makes much more sense than your original reply to be honest..

[boredprograming]

Yes. I was wrong. But there's also not conspiracy which is what I was trying to rationalize. There's so much BS on the internet these days that are the modern day versions of astrology. Trying to find patterns in randomness to justify crazy beliefs. Most anti vax "information" is such

[spadez]

Making asserting statements when you don't have any evidence for such assertion is also BS, which sadly adds up to the already existing BS on the internet.

So why not stop adding to it.