What do you mean by "impossible"? I just described exactly how people get that experience: they mess up definitions. It is a perfectly logical description.
Under influence people think peeing in public is OK is plausible, though logically it is not the best action to take. So that is not unique either.
Use the concept of paradoxes in Taoism as a metaphor for nondualism:
> The paradox is that by talking about the Tao, and by attempting to define the Tao, we ensure that the reader does not actually grasp the concept. At its heart, the Tao is nonverbal in its essence, beyond the confines of language. The Tao is an experience rather than definition.
Each tradition has their own version. For the west, it's the coincidentia oppositorum of Nicholas of Cusa. This goes beyond definitions because language can't describe it. This is not a failing, this is the essence of its impossibility.
You're starting to get it. Paradoxes, contradictions, and nonsense is how these traditions attempt to get the practitioner to overcome dualism. The problem is that you think you can use either-or logic to understand it when the practice is designed to destroy it.
Under influence people think peeing in public is OK is plausible, though logically it is not the best action to take. So that is not unique either.