[yjftsjthsd-h]

How would they even know to ask upstream for support, rather than the fork? If you use package bar and have a problem, you would have to do a lot of digging to even find original progject foo and ask them for help (which wouldn't even make sense since it's a separate thing)

[numo16]

I guess that depends on how users go about finding projects on github to file issues. If, for example, the user has an issue with this NixOS package (or debian package/any other repackaged example), and they start by just searching "python ambee github" or "Home Assistant ambee github" (seems like a reasonable first attempt to me) they will likely find the upstream near the top of the results.

Now, some users will perform due diligence and maybe find the NixOS issue referenced in OP and look elsewhere, but many will find the project and immediately file an issue there in the upstream, leading to the author's main concern of "I don't have time to support NixOS issues".

[yjftsjthsd-h]

That's fair; I was assuming that the fork would be renamed substantially enough to obscure the origin.

[gls2ro]

Ah I think you might be right with this case where someone will just google that. I am not doing that but prefer to go to the package manager list find there there the project URL.

I was thinking that people will do the same or else how will they know if the github repository returned from search results is truly the one installed?