[vincent-toups]

The Economist certainly doesn't break down easily on the American political spectrum, but in the more coherent language of higher level policy, the Economist is almost 100% liberal.

I agree its a well put together publication, but a socialist (for instance) would argue it is deeply ideological.

[sudosysgen]

Well, it is deeply ideological. But if we're being honest, everything is. The Economist is fine to read as long as you really deeply understand it's ideology.

[JAlexoid]

The Economist doesn't hide their ideology and advocacy.

Unlike many "well renowned sources" (ahem... NYT)

[sudosysgen]

What would you think the ideology of the Economist is and where in their website do you get that from? Just asking for the sake of argument.

[JAlexoid]

They routinely repeat that their editorial policy is liberal. Straight up in the articles they publish, they note that.

I listen to their articles and they often repeat this.

Literally typing this into Google would have provided you with the link to their website.

https://www.economist.com/news/2020/06/19/frequently-asked-q...

[sudosysgen]

From that webpage, they say that their bias is between classical liberalism and centrism.

Now, what is a classically liberal bias, concretely, as far as international affairs are concerned?

[JAlexoid]

Free trade and non-interventionism.

[I-M-S]

Socially liberal, fiscally conservative. And VERY much pro status quo.