|
|
|
|
|
by bencollier49
1838 days ago
|
|
Of course he sees his children; there are plenty of documented occasions when he's been with them recently, and why would we know about the others? Having an injunction on naming a child isn't disownment. It's protecting the privacy of the child. Name it, and now it needs police protection 24/7. Your characterisation is way off track IMO, but it's a popular viewpoint on Twitter and in the Guardian. |
|