|
|
|
|
|
by magicsmoke
1840 days ago
|
|
Seems like this could be mitigated by having a network of radar emitters that periodically turn on and off while sharing targeting information through the network to non-emitting missile launchers. Maybe the emitters could also be mobile and drive away to deter inertial-based targeting. Seems almost like a shoot-and-scoot artillery system except with radar instead of rounds. The concept would also work by networking the radars of a flight of fighters together so none of them would have to continuously transmit while also allowing fighters to illuminate targets from multiple angles. |
|
Missile launch sites are located separately from radar sites so they can’t be targeted (since they have no radar emissions themselves) and so that pilots don’t know ahead of time where to look for missile plumes for visual indicators of a launch.
All of these sites are networked so can feed information across a large region and back to a hardened command center far away. Sharing information this way allows minimizing the amount of time between a vulnerable front-line system revealing its location and launching a missile at its target. Tracking radar and missile sites can even wait to become active until a hostile aircraft is over or even past them to defeat wild-weasel style tactics.
Both tracking radar and missile sites are also often mobile so once they’ve disclosed their location by using radar and/or firing a missile, they can quickly move to a new location to avoid retaliatory strikes from anti-radiation missiles and regain the element of surprise.