|
|
|
|
|
|
by new_here
1829 days ago
|
|
|
I see, so the it's likely that a generic URL pattern (like your example) was accidentally included in their caching rules. I guess I didn't think of that originally because I thought if you wanted to cache some kind of response data like this, why on earth would you use a generic URL? But perhaps they probably didn't intend to cache this endpoint. |
|
|