Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by samfisher83 1833 days ago
How did his wife get no prison time?
6 comments

They can't arrest a husband and wife for the same crime.
In case you missed the reference: https://youtu.be/75iv3RKQUAM
I have the worst fucking attornies
That's not at all true.
A reference to the TV show Arrested Development :) Terrible legal advice given to a crooked businessman!
Yes they can. And there are lots of examples.
Oh, sure, downvote a commenter because they didn't watch Arrested Development. c'mon, HN. :-P
Just speculation, but they may have children, and if so, prosecutors may have wanted to keep at least one parent out of jail.
It would be nice if prosecutors really were that compassionate. I've read that lots of kids end up in foster care because their parents go to jail. But maybe that only happens to poor people.

An alternative would be to have criminal parents serve time consecutively -- that way noone gets away, and the children would not have to be taken away.

From the article

> As part of the plea agreement, Bohra’s wife will not face criminal charges. Bohra’s wife is no longer employed at Amazon.

I understand the plea deal, but why. I am assuming they had evidence she gave him the data. Why let her off?
May be they would have to risk a trial to convict both but he would plea guilty to protect his wife. If the state believes he was the most responsible then they may judge a guaranteed conviction without the cost of trial to be worth it.

The wife (and family) lost 2.6 million, plus her job, and the husband - so it's not like she got away with something, just avoided the worst of the punishment.

disgorged 2.6 million, that means just losing the ill-gotten gains. It's not fair to call that "lost".
No. $2.6M "in disgorgement, interest and penalties." The ill-gotten gains were only $1.4M.

They had to pay back their gains, pay additional fees, and one of them serves jail time. They did not get away with anything.

If they kept the $2.6M in a liquid saving account just for cases like this one, yeah, that wouldn't be so bad. But I don't expect that's the case and in practice that could mean for example losing her house.
> I understand the plea deal, but why. I am assuming they had evidence she gave him the data. Why let her off?

"Giving someone the data" is probably a different violation to "trading with illegally obtained data".

She probably got a different penalty (breaking NDA or similar) then he did.

if you don't personally profit from the bet... it's not one.
>Insider trading violations may also include "tipping" such information, securities trading by the person "tipped," and securities trading by those who misappropriate such information.

It sounds to me like even giving information to someone if you know that person will trade is illegal.

https://www.investor.gov/introduction-investing/investing-ba...

She only committed some light treason.
They kicked back and relaxed, Emphasis on kickback.

Basically they were able to cough up the $2mm the SEC wanted in the parallel civil suit, and didnt attempt to challenge the criminal case, so the prosecutors in the criminal case chose not to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women-are-wonderful_effect

Women generally get less time for the same crime.