[murbard2]

At no point in time does Kelly give you more wealth with probability 1, and there is no reason to care about "more wealth with high probability", that's not even a transitive comparison function.

[concreteblock]

> At no point in time does Kelly give you more wealth with probability 1,

Either you're claiming that the theorem I attempted to describe is false, or you're misunderstanding the theorem I am trying to describe.

I never wrote anything about 'high probability' either so I don't know why you introduced that notion.