|
|
|
|
|
by musiccog
1840 days ago
|
|
As an older full-stack/full-cycle developer for many years, this article made sense - and gave quite a bit of hope.
If you can't dog-food your product, IMHO developers need to be as close to the coal face of their 'product' as possible.
Per the article, assigning a team to a feature has allowed Netflix to get better coding outcomes. With that said, I can also see a potential downside to this development model.
Once a new feature is stable enough, the number of people required to support it has to reduce.
Wondering how Netflix solved this? |
|