That’s true. And it’s also true for any stock that doesn’t pay dividends as well. Should people not invest in those stocks? Or should we ban non-dividend stocks for being Ponzi schemes?
At least stocks/companies have a balance sheet with real assets. Even if the whole company shut down (and wasn’t bankrupt) investors would still get at least some of their money back after liquidation.
Dividends are just one of the many ways that companies accrue value. Companies use revenues to invest in the business, to repurchase shares and also to issue dividends. This net welfare accretion must be considered in its totality.
Just because a company doesn't issue dividends doesn't make it a Ponzi scheme, and it doesn't make it a zero sum investment (like precious metals) or an negative sum investment (like PoW coins and to a lesser extent, most (all?) other coins).
“In the short run, the market is a voting machine, but in the long run, it is a weighing machine”
I don't think (in my lifetime) I've heard anyone discuss buying or selling a stock in the context of a Dividend Discount Model.
This observation isn't really in support of Bitcoin, it's more of a depressing thought that our stock markets are closer to a Keynesian beauty contest. (GME, AMC, etc).
I don't personally own stocks or real estate for cash flow purposes. I own them with the expectation that I can sell them for more money down the line.