|
|
|
|
|
|
by croes
1842 days ago
|
|
|
Regardless of the whole Twitter thing.
What's wrong with a 4-star rating?
It's not a math exam where there are right and wrong answers and you can get 100% = 5stars with the right knowledge.
It is always a subjective impression and even the best book ever will not get only 5 stars. >From Lauren's perspective, what on earth could she possibly have done to garner a 5 star review? Been abused more? Once again it is not an exam, there is no sure way to 100%, especially not 100% with 100% of the reviewers.
Doesn't this show a similar mentality to the Twitter mob? |
|
|