|
|
|
|
|
|
by NavinF
1835 days ago
|
|
|
No, it's very practical. A lot of devices are just too weak to encode anything other than H.264 so that's the one codec you must support. Other codecs are better, but you have to do more testing and enable those codecs only on calls where all members are using a device that supports it. |
|
|
Not that your point is wrong, but a lot of devices are too weak to encode/decode H264 as well. It's very recent for me to have access to second-hand hardware with H264 support and still i'm in western Europe where it's easier to come by.
Though as the other commenter pointed out, if you can afford to use hardware en/decoders then it's always the better option.