|
|
|
|
|
by kazinator
1846 days ago
|
|
That is true; however, we cannot remove a tangible thing without it being obvious that it's lacking and unavailable to the owner. As a result, more people are on board with the tangible property social construct. Intellectual property is more like, you and I have some tangible property, and I'm not allowed to tweak my property into the a particular configuration that is exhibited by your property (or equivalent forms), without permission. That situation also defines privacy, and also secrecy. I suspect more people are on board with caring about privacy and secrecy, than caring about copyright. |
|