[alexanderdmitri]

Many people on HN are the ones making the "sausage" grandparent refers to. Maybe the more general public still eats the free food and looks the other way to give the benefit of the doubt, but it's surely a signal that a good deal of people involved with the factory process and its engineering are having a hard time stomaching it.

[ryandrake]

> a good deal of people involved with the factory process and its engineering are having a hard time stomaching it.

Yet we continue to make the sausage.

Whenever privacy stuff comes up on HN, the comments go really weird: "Privacy is good, companies should stop spying on users. Targeted ads are intrusive and collect too much data." - said by people whose next JIRA ticket at work is to add another ad tracker to their own product! Point this out, and suddenly it's "Well, a job's a job.. We have no power over what we work on, and just do what management says." - Right next to the other HN article talking about how software engineers have a great deal of market power, company choice, and mobility due to the shortage of engineers. It's just contradiction after contradiction.

[parthdesai]

Is there? Is facebook really having a hard time hiring new engineers? Last time I checked, it still was super hard to get a job at facebook, implying there are a lot of people willing to work at facebook.

[gpm]

From what I've seen Facebook pays better than just about anyone else for the same engineer. So while they're not having trouble doing that, it seems likely that they are paying a premium to overcome people's stomachs.

[alexanderdmitri]

They pay well, are influential in several high-profile and widely-used projects and have lots of really interesting challenges to work on and solve at their scale.

[parthdesai]

> a good deal of people involved with the factory process and its engineering are having a hard time stomaching it

So, at the end of the day, people are willing to look past privacy issues when it comes to walk the walk. It's easy to sit back and criticize something when you don't have anything to lose. You only really know if you actually care about an issue when you're willing to sacrifice for it. And clearly according to you, pay, interesting problems to work on >> privacy. So again, a few people like to think it matters more than it actually does to a lot of people.

[alexanderdmitri]

Of course, it's like many people in American health insurance are making a buck off a system that bankrupts the sick or maybe people who are worried about climate change but still work for a company that disproportionally exacerbates the issue because they have too many other personal priorities to account for. Also like these other issues, there's creeping normalcy and once the effects are apparent, it's very difficult (if not impossible) to rollback. This is more a systemic conversation in that individuals who find themselves having to choose between concrete, personal growth and more nebulous (often controversial) public good can't be expected to be accountable on both levels in many cases. I don't understand the argument that people raising ethical or even general concerns about their work/industry should quit and get replaced, and then point to their replacement as the reason the original concern was unfounded.