Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by AnimalMuppet 1849 days ago
Seems to me there's a constitutional amendment against that particular unfunded mandate. (Yeah, I know, that was specifically housing soldiers. I'm not sure a court would agree, constitutionally, that the government can force you to house civilians either.)
1 comments

Considering the current makeup of the Supreme Court, I highly doubt they would fail to make the distinction between soldiers and civilians. Aren't half of them literal constitutionalists?
I doubt they're that literal... but I could be wrong.