[aplorbust]

Do the parents understand that spying on people is how the industry makes money? Surely, "the industry" would not spy on people without a "business" reason. There seeems to be a belief by every participant in "the industry" that they must learn things about users and they should not always have to ask permission to gather such information.

Sometimes people on HN try to analogise to something like a retail industry where a customer can be observed through their purchases. However there is a major difference. The purchase. That is the ultimate goal of the retailer attained. A purchase. The retail business is not some honeypot to gather information on people. It is trying to make sales. Users of "free" internet-connected products and services generally do not make purchases from the provider of those products/services. They are not fulfilling the goal of the business: to make money. Thus, the company must find paying customers somewhere else.

Particularly amusing is the oft-used "justification" of [we spy on you] "to make our ["free"] products and services better." Sometimes participants in "the industry" suggest they are trying to make products and services better for users. Other times it less clear exactly who the improvements are (purportedly) intended to benefit. Of course the ultimate goal, because this "industry" of spying is considered by them as a "business", is to make things better for paying customers. If they fail to collect information from users, they do not make money and the "business" fails. Even non-profits supported by deals with advertising companies feel compelled to conduct "telemetry". Not learning about users is deemed unacceptable.

"Spy or die".