|
|
|
|
|
by vineyardmike
1839 days ago
|
|
Isn't that worst of both worlds? Still EXPENSIVE as hell, and no big open spaces to yourself, but also still not a quick stroll to all the world-class amenities of SF. Maybe it varies for other people, but when i think of "live in to enjoy the city" i think 2 blocks from enough food to never cook again, new bars every friday, a quick transit ride to almost any activity i could want - and no car ownership needed. Its a lifestyle of living out of the city as a communal space, not a destination to visit on weekends. |
|
Combining that with the fact that we don't do bars, we cook and need car ownership so we can do hike-trips...