Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sevenf0ur 1850 days ago
Not everyone is wealthy enough or wants to move into an area and buy a house. Landlords make this possible. They also keep up with all the maintenance that any homeowner is familiar with. Houses are in a constant state of decay.
1 comments
MereInterest 1850 days ago
Except that landlords make a profit. The rent is higher than the mortgage+expenses. The landlord assumes risk of depreciation, but the response to the 2008 financial crisis showed that risk to be minimal.

That extra profit is an incentive for landlords to buy more, which pushes up the price of houses overall, whether being bought to live in, or bought to rent out

link
Chris2048 1849 days ago
> The landlord assumes risk of depreciation, but the response to the 2008 financial crisis showed that risk to be minimal

Then it seems you think risk is overpriced. That fair enough.

But if the whole market of landlords disagrees, the burden is on you to demonstrate otherwise.

> the response to the 2008 financial crisis showed

That's like saying "the fact my house didn't burn down showed that my fire-insurance was worthless". That's not how risk works.

If you disagree, buy a house yourself, and offer it at lower-than-market rental rates. If no one with skin in the game is willing to do that, what can be done? It's not like the lower-end rental market is only affordable to the 1% - There are plenty small-time middle-class landlords.

link