Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by a-posteriori 1845 days ago
The issue with your argument is the government chanced the eviction rules ex post facto.

Yes, the poster is taking the risk that they tenants cannot pay, but they also took that risk with the assumption they could evict them and replace them with a paying tenant.

1 comments

So, if I owned stock in Denny's and the government banned indoor dining I should get my losses refunded?
If the government bans indoor dining, losses are the least of your worries.

If the government has the power to ban dining there is no longer a free market or a free country.

It's why so many people are moving to Texas. They understand the wisdom of small government.