|
|
|
|
|
|
by pjerem
1846 days ago
|
|
|
> 1) The fact that we are far from a federal government doesn't mean we'll always be such. Maybe, and I'm not even against the idea. But it would have nothing to do with European Union (the current entity) > 2) [...] I'm not an US expert, and I mostly have the same picture as you. I don't see what you are trying to prove ? > 3) [...] I never said that one system was better than the other, just that they are different with different strengths and different weakness but that migrating from one to the other is extremely difficult and probably require creating new entities. I totally can imagine an European Federation but I don't see it being the same entity as the European Union. |
|
|
We are going into hypotheticals here. I am pretty convinced you are wrong, but only time will tell.
> I don't see what you are trying to prove ?
It was mentioned that the EU "cannot even enforce <some law>", but the reality is that the US federal government, that model of global cohesive superpower, more often than not cannot do that either. Do we go around saying the US government cannot do anything right, because coordinating 50 states is impossible? No, of course they can do some stuff right. Same for the EU. Already the fact that there is one "supreme tribunal" across the continent is quite remarkable, as well as a single currency for most of the Union, or a single arrest warrant, etc etc. Things move slowly but they do move, and if enough people keep pushing for a united Europe, sooner or later we'll get there.