|
|
|
|
|
|
by simondotau
1850 days ago
|
|
|
I wholeheartedly agree with all of the above—assuming that you are your own client. If you have the knowledge and can weigh the pros and cons for yourself, go for it. I was more thinking about a scenario where you're acting as the systems administrator for someone else who's not so technical. If you were in charge of maintaining George R.R. Martin's WordStar workstation, at the very minimum I doubt you'd feel comfortable having it using a period-correct Quantum Fireball or IBM DeskStar... > That's good advice in any vehicle :) I wish it was advice. Unfortunately it's not, it's a warning. You can do everything right and still be the victim of someone else's bad luck or bad life choices. Whether it's an oncoming car or getting T-boned at an intersection, the risk of a serious crash exists no matter how good of a driver you are. The difference between a car made in 2015 and a car made in 1980 can easily be as dramatic as walking out with superficial injuries—or certain death. The newer car will help you to wash off more speed prior to impact, it will absorb more of the crash energy in its chassis before it gets transferred to your body, and it will deploy precisely timed airbags in concert with a seatbelt pretensioner, all to ensure that the internal organs inside your body decelerate as gently as possible. I love classic cars in the abstract, but I'd never drive one. |
|
|
Yes, I was talking from that perspective. Just to remember people that not everything has to be the best possible ever.
> The difference between a car made in 2015 and a car made in 1980 can easily be as dramatic as walking out with superficial injuries—or certain death.
I was replying tongue-in-cheek. This is certainly true, and I appreciate your concern