Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by speeder 1851 days ago
It is not just that.

For example if you read letters from Dom Pedro I to Dom Pedro II, and also see the opinions they had, both believed Brazillian economy was backwards and stupid, they believed strongly that it would be far more profitable, not just for the country, but even for the large landowners, if they agreed with the end of slavery, because it would create a consumer class (among other things).

I also saw similar issues regarding modernization of manufacturing, with the government wanting it but the elite resisting.

When the State finally ended slavery for good (after many attempts! For example one thing I was never taught in school, is that Brazil explicitly allowed England to sink Brazillian slaver ships way before slavery officially ended, as an attempt to end slavery while not antagonizing the elite), instead the elite kicked the government out and created its own.

Things basically remain this way, whenever the leadership is promising, the elite kick it out somehow.

2 comments

The idea that land owning elites deposed the emperor because of emancipation is a mix of grade school historical simplification and monarchist propaganda, which is scarily pervasive on any google search about the period, given how small of a political movement it is.
> Brazil explicitly allowed England to sink Brazillian slaver ships

Killing all slaves in the ship?

Well, theoretically the threat of sinking the ship would make people not attempt at all, or surrender the slaves to England.

But I really doubt this theoretical approach always worked... probably trigger happy english captains existed.