|
|
|
|
|
by jl6
1851 days ago
|
|
Feels like you are drawing a distinction between harms, and recursive harms. Harmful things can be analyzed; the risks can be quantified and weighed up against the benefits; the downside can be limited. Recursively harmful things - which not only cause harm but precipitate further rounds of harm - are harder to analyze and have potentially infinite downside. |
|
For single act harms, future terms don't exist.
And for recursive, add in a probability weighting, if one wants to be pedantic about modeling.