Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Someone1234 1852 days ago
If a company does this, I am NEVER subscribing again.

Whereas if a company makes cancelling/renewing super painless I'm going to come and go as a customer as it fits my needs. This results in more overall business for the company.

I am literally going through this right now: A company called "Ooma" makes dongles that provide voice-over-IP for landline phones (inc. a telephone number), for $10/month with "no contract." But our use-case isn't every month, it is once every few months, and they require call-to-cancel/hassle-to-cancel, so now we're reviewing alternatives that are more legitimately flexible.

They're literally going to lose my recurring business only because of this anti-consumer practice.

3 comments

I subscribed to The Economist for a quarter. Loved it, read every article in every issue. I ran into some slightly difficult times so I decided to cancel, intending to pick it back up later. But their cancellation process was full of dark patterns (ultimately I had to make a phone call to an operator in Singapore) and there's simply no way in hell I'll ever come back.

I cancelled my Netflix at the same time and have come and gone several times since, as they make it as easy as possible.

Yes! Good for you, bad for Ooma and other companies who use this dark pattern.
FWIW, I've been a happy voip.ms customer for a decade or so.