Because the top article is a NYT article, and this forum is largely American in composition. There are interesting discussions about free speech rights in other countries, but in this case it’s reasonable to assume an American context.
> Do people from other countries deserve to have their digital pasts weaponized
I’ll remind you that presuming good faith is a rule here, this is a nakedly bad faith interpretation of what I said.
Because the top article is a NYT article, and this forum is largely American in composition. There are interesting discussions about free speech rights in other countries, but in this case it’s reasonable to assume an American context.
> Do people from other countries deserve to have their digital pasts weaponized
I’ll remind you that presuming good faith is a rule here, this is a nakedly bad faith interpretation of what I said.