| > these things still do not seem to get adopted If I understand your comment correctly, the reason you are using an old, insecure, and broken tool is because the secure replacement is not as widely used? Are you looking for some specific percentage of the population to adopt it? What is that threshold? > Signal is OK I guess, but still does not solve a lot of things a decentralized system can. Serious question: what problem does a decentralized tool that old, insecure, and broken solve that you would use it instead of one that is secure but "centralized"? > People always join these conversations to namedrop projects to sound smart and security conscious I can't judge other people's motivation for mentioning PGP/GPG alternatives, but the projects they mention certainly fit the criteria for being secure replacements. Are you going to disregard their answers because you have deemed their motivations unfit? > apparently not having tried to integrate them into their existing workflows. If you could explain your specific PGP/GPG workflow, perhaps someone might be able to suggest something to replace it. |