[comodore_]

The subheading of the article is the only time "fossil fuel" is mentioned, not a single mention after that

>Artists are harnessing NFTs to sell their work but ignoring the vast amount of fossil fuels needed to power them.

this article is FUD

> [...] while the rest of us are saddled with an environmental impact nobody can afford to bear. One can’t help but wonder if the proud new owner of Western Flag will think it was all worth it on some day, not so very far from now, when the coastal cities have drowned, the brackish water that comes from the tap needs to be boiled before it is safe to drink and climate refugees huddle in tent cities stretching to the horizon.

[confiq]

why is it FUD? Because environment impact is not that big?