|
|
|
|
|
|
by CRConrad
1854 days ago
|
|
|
> But the first line in the article suggests that it is an attack against the entire idea of writing good quality code: > 'It may not be possible for us to ever reach empirical definitions of "good code" or "clean code" If you re-read that line you quoted you may find that it talks of the (im)possibility of defining what "good code" or "clean code" is, not of actually writing it. A bit like pornography in that way. |
|
|