|
|
|
|
|
by TheOtherHobbes
1848 days ago
|
|
Concorde failed because of politics, not technology. The US wanted to make way for its own SST project so it limited Concorde's access to the US market. A Concorde B variant with an even longer range and quieter engines was already being developed, and airlines were very interested in it. if the US market had been more open it's likely other markets would have followed suit. Once it was stabilised in the market other improvements would have followed. Concorde was always a first class for the first class market, not an air bus. But if supersonic travel had become established there would have been market pressure to commoditise it, and we might have seen a continuing supersonic long haul market working in parallel with the smaller more local subsonic services we have now. |
|
I dispute that airlines were actually interested in a Concorde B. The economic problems of supersonic flight would have remained.
There's a reason Boeing abandoned any pretense of interest in SST after Congress declined to fund it.