| > This is not relevant to my original argument, but I pointed this out because you bucketed all Asian people together. It's toxic and ignorant, that is why I am educating you. > Yes, official sources do not because there is a political convenience to group all Asians together. Really, the arrogance and rudeness is outstanding here, I have to wonder whether you are talking about your own toxicity and ignorance. Your concept of illumination is to offer pet analysis and pet causal theories, and imaginary drill-downs into the data which don't exist! You are engaging in theory-crafting as if the conversation just began here, today. American data collection culture, including academia and government, groups Asians together. You are making your own fantasy data, and making awful accusations based on your personal fantasies of what people are doing. I'm talking about effect sizes, and not from the basis of my own self-proclaimed international awareness. Observe for yourself how many replies this thread can go before you offer any semblance of something that isn't your own pet analysis. |
And that can't be challenged?
In some dictatorships, the government can claim 95% of the election votes went to the incumbent.
The US unemployment rate published by the Bureau of Labor does not reflect the true unemployment rate.
The Three-fifths Compromise considered certain people only worth 3/5th of a person. Government defined metrics aren't a scientific / objective measure of the physical or moral world.
> pet analysis and pet causal theories, and imaginary drill-downs into the data which don't exist! ... You are making your own fantasy data
Let me know if you get a 404 error
https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/chart/educational-...
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/these-groups-of-asian...
https://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2017/04/19/524571669...