|
|
|
|
|
by lhorie
1847 days ago
|
|
Not that I'm doubting you, I'm just trying to understand this claim. Can you explain the motivation behind exporting at a loss? If the argument is that there's too much timber supply driving down prices to the point that some of the inventory is sold at a loss, wouldn't it make more sense to just cut less trees? |
|
I am not sure why they didn't just cut less trees other than they probably had bids that would expire ( another policy problem ).