They're implemented with closures, not passing things through FIFOs. It's not magic. You barely need a compiler pass to implement the sugar for `for` loops: it's a trivial transformation to a `while`.
Okay, but what’s the benefit for go. I can iterate over slices, maps and channels (for ... range). Slices must have a capacity defined. What’s the benefit of lazy iterator?
for over a channel is in essence lazy. Channel stores the data as a linked list. So what’s the benefit.
The benefit of generic iterators or implementing iterators lazily? The benefit of generic iterators is that they make SOLID programs easy to write, especially when converting data. It makes any kind of data ingest or hand rolled parsing/semantic analysis easy to write, read, and hard to screw up - which is 90% of business logic.
Lazy evaluation is the only reasonable way to implement iterators so you don't have to pay the costs of intermediate data structures or sending data over channels. Insertion into a data structure isn't free. Function composition is.
for over a channel is in essence lazy. Channel stores the data as a linked list. So what’s the benefit.