|
|
|
|
|
by mjburgess
1856 days ago
|
|
A dog's environment isn't roads. And no car has been design for a dog to drive. Were such a car to exist, it is clear the dog would win in very very many environments (almost all). As would a mouse, let alone a dog. That it may be possible to rig a human environment to be replete with so many symbols (road signs, etc.) that an incredibly dumb automated system can follow them is hardly here-nor-there. Personally, I dont even think that will be possible. Self-driving cars may work on highways and motorways; I don't see there being any in cities. Not for centuries. (Absent pretty big engineering projects to make cities so overly sign'd that a non-intelligent automated system could navigate them. Consider, eg., existing automated trains & train networks.) |
|
This seems incredibly unlikely. AI vastly outperforms 99.99% of humans on various video games, and 100% on many others. I'll bet on a well trained ml model over a dog every time.
> That it may be possible to rig a human environment to be replete with so many symbols (road signs, etc.) that an incredibly dumb automated system can follow them is hardly here-nor-there.
We already have above average human performance with just normal road signs, and could also simply use digital information.
> Self-driving cars may work on highways and motorways; I don't see there being any in cities. Not for centuries.
Goalpost shifting