Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by linuxftw 1848 days ago
It's enough to put people to death, so it should be enough for everything else.
3 comments

Twelve randomly selected lay people shouldn't get to decide to allow the State to kill people, either.
No argument here. I was just point out how trivial our systems are, and we still kill other humans based on the feelings other humans.
At least that requires unanimous decisions vs civil cases where it just has to be the majority.
The legal standard for a conviction/judgement also changes, from "beyond a reasonable doubt" in criminal to "preponderance of the evidence" in civil- i.e. 99.9% certainty becomes 51% certainty.
Every criminal case involves more than a jury. The prosecutor has to decide to bring charges, judge has to accept the case, etc. Death penalty cases are more involved. I've sat through the automatic appeals that were part of California's process.