[stale2002]

Ok, but then don't go around pretending like you are someone who opposes government intervention.

Instead, it is other people, who want to get the government out of our phones, and not have the coercive, government force, under threat of violence, preventing us from doing things with phones that we purchased.

If you want to say that you support the government, using force and coercion, and government intervention, into people's lives, fine. But that is your position. And it is extremely anti-free market.

But, if your position, is that you support this government coercion, then I am not sure why you would get upset about other forms for laws, and government coercion, given that you want the government to forcibly prevent other people from doing things with phones.

Because you absolutely support government coercion, that would be government force on people, who are doing things with phones that they own.

[tmp231]

> preventing us from doing things with phones that we purchased.

Nobody is preventing you. Who is preventing you? There’s no government action here. You buy the phone or you buy a librephone. Let’s leave the government out altogether.

You’re the one pushing for some kind of regulation against free agents interacting. No need to contact the federals on this.

[stale2002]

> Nobody is preventing you

You were advocating in favor of using the government to "enforce a contract" or whatever, on people doing what they want with the phone that they own.

> You buy the phone or you buy a librephone.

And if someone buys an iPhone they should have the full right to do whatever they want with it, and the government should absolutely not be preventing people from doing so.

> Let’s leave the government out altogether.

Yes, lets ensure that the government never prevents anyone from doing what they want with the phone that they purchased.

So if you take back your previous statements, and instead agree with me that the government should not prevent people from doing what they want with their phone, then cool.

But otherwise, if you disagree, then you would be the one advocating in favor of using government coercion here against people.

[tmp231]

So it sounds like you don’t agree with contract law. that if you make an agreement with someone or something that you are bound to keep your word. You somehow think that because you agreed to something voluntarily that the government should then act and impose new terms on the parties.

That’s one reason why we are regulation drunk in this country. Instead if having a simple rule that says you live up to contracts that you agree to, now we have to have a million rules for exceptions to contracts people sign.

I do t thing we can get anywhere if you don’t agree with contract law.

[stale2002]

> So it sounds like you don’t agree

I am merely commenting on how it sounds like you want to use government coercion to force people to do or not do things with a phone that they own.

You can support government coercion if you want. But that is your position.

Don't go around pretending like you want to get the government out of stuff, when you want the government to come in, and prevent people from doing things with their own property.

> why we are regulation drunk in this country

It seems like you are the person who is pro regulation, as you want the government to come in, and require certain things about a phone that they own.

> I dont thing we can get anywhere

I just want you to stop pretending like you are some anti government regulation and anti coercion person. You support lots of coercion.

You support a pretty darn coercive thing, which is that you government force to be enacted on people, merely because of what they are doing with a phone that they own.

Whatever attack you are making against other people, regarding government coercion, on this issue, you are much worse than those other people, because you are the one who wants to come in, and force people to do things or not do things with their phones.

Whereas, other people, instead want the government to not stop people from doing things with their own phone.

On this specific issue, you are the pro government coercion person, and everyone else, who wants people to control their own phones, are the anti-coercion people.