[colinmhayes]

I just want extraordinary claims without evidence to be marked as such. If you want to claim the election is rigged you should need some evidence. At that point everyone can make an informed decision about if they believe the claim is true.

[tomjen3]

Then we would just have the same fight over what is considered evidence.

Not that I believe the election was stolen, but I think the lab leak is the most credible, to a great degree because it was censored so badly earlier.

[colinmhayes]

That's up to the reader. When they see a claim marked "unfounded" it's on them to figure out whether they believe it is true or not.