|
|
|
|
|
by tisFine
1852 days ago
|
|
I keep hearing about walled gardens, and not how it’s merely a choice among many. Linux works on tablets and phones. What’s that? It’s a janky mess? Maybe developers could stop looking at the green grass on Apples side of the fence and bring that polish to open-source. But I imagine that will simply devolve into the mess it already is, with flame wars, and figurative genital punching to prove how hardcore one is for the obfuscated C they cobbled together. There was time when Linux distributions were thought of as walled gardens. Cobble together just the right collection of source for you! Don’t let Red Hat control your mind! SystemD is a cage for your soul! Meanwhile, Apple just got the damn job done and moved on. If it’s a choice between masochistic elitism or filtered content. Hmmm… |
|
No, that's just a garden. A garden is where a single trusted entity cultivates the plants it wants in the way it wants. It has boundaries, but not necessarily walls.
Walled gardens are a strict subset of gardens. A walled garden doesn't let you go out and forage from the wilds to augment the produce of the garden.