[zepto]

> So we agree that Facebook never actually said this?

Why would you think that?

Anyone following this would know that Facebook said this. They took out a full page ad in the New York Times.

>Not sure why you're referencing Apples docs for Facebooks supposed comment..

The reference to Apple’s docs is about the tracking mechanism which you wrongly claimed worked like location tracking.

It doesn’t, and you can check this in Apple’s docs.

[thebean11]

> because they (Facebook) have told us in public that they would

> You can trivially check this yourself.

> You won’t find a ‘quote’

You're backpedalling and it's really unclear what you're talking about, leading me to assume you're making it up or misrepresenting something.

If it's so trivial to find why can't you produce it?

[zepto]

>> because they (Facebook) have told us in public that they would

They have.

>> You can trivially check this yourself.

You can.

>> You won’t find a ‘quote’

You won’t find a ‘quote’ - that was your word. We’re talking about a technical and legal mechanism here. You will find documents. I’ve told you which ones.

> You're backpedalling

Clearly not.

> and it's really unclear what you're talking about,

That’s because you haven’t taken the steps needed to understand.

> leading me to assume you're making it up or misrepresenting something.

That’s and unfortunate and incorrect assumption. You can check but you choose not to.

Perhaps it’s not trivial for you to check this. Maybe you are unable to make sense of technical and legal documents for yourself. If so, I am sorry to have assumed that you could.

> If it's so trivial to find why can't you produce it?

I have told you where to look. It doesn’t seem like you want to. Perhaps you are unable.